You're doing a lot really well - looking forward to seeing this become a more fully featured design tool! if you want to really become a Sketch 'killer' - supporting copy(Sketch)/paste (XD)would be INCREDIBLE Symbol organization - even thought the / hack is a hack, it works pretty well.(future beta) Linked libraries with external libraries. ![]() Sketch - Non - destructive symbol overrides - MAJOR (not just text but style, icon, object etc.) Important Sketch 'advantages' and why I have not /cannot move from it at this point include: This exists in Sketch today but is alleviated by the ability to add plugins to enhance the toolset and general workflow. I guess there will always be a difference between core vs 'pro/power user' features. Hoping that XD can break me away from that. but at times now, Sketch feels sluggish and has bugs that persist for months (or years). I turned to Sketch as it was more focused for the uses I need over Photoshop. The dedication to simplicity and performance is excellent. I know you can copy/paste exported SVGs, but something more direct would be appreciated.Īll that said, I truly appreciate what you guys are building and hope you succeed. sketch import functionality coming to XD soon? This would do wonders for easing people into the tool who are coming from Sketch. As soon as it supports XD, I'll consider making the switch fulltime.Īdditionally, with Sketch opening up their file format, can we expect to see. One plugin in particular, as I'm sure the team is fully aware of is Zeplin. Are these on the roadmap in the near-term? One of the single most important features of Sketch is the ease of building plugins - they support and have enabled so much more than the core team could implement. Used Photoshop for UI for years, moved to Sketch a few years back, but would love to move to XD fulltime. But why was that feature even implemented now, when basic features like guides and JPEG export are still missing? Everything else is neatly contained in the main window, so should CC Libraries. I'll second the comment about CC Libraries being a new window. it will not be good for their impression of XD. That doesn't seem like a good approach as new users are evaluating XD and seeing poorly implemented features. This implementation of styles is the weakest of any Adobe app I've used so far, and seems rushed for the sake of getting it to market. it makes me wonder why? InDesign's approach of dealing with overrides, etc is just awesome. Seriously though, Adobe InDesign has awesome style sheets and Adobe XD launches with such poorly implemented styles. ![]() There are no paragraph styles so text alignment can't be saved into a style (plus there's no space before or after a paragraph). You can't see what style is currently applied, if you resize a text box, the style connection is lost (with no way to indicate whether it is connected or not). , without having the tool snap the path or select multiple (and I stress the word multiple, because you need to select multiple points to see this bug) points to the pixel grid.Why were character styles implemented so poorly? You can't name them. If the user chooses, from the Preferences and Snap settings in the Menu, to not Snap (to the pixel grid or anything else), they should be able to use both the Direct Selection tool and Path Selection tool to move: This behavior is obviously a bug in the latest version of Photoshop that needs to get fixed. If you use the tool to actually move your path it will always Snap to Pixel Grid, regardless of your Preferences or Snap settings from the menu.Īll of the responses that mention turning off Snap to Pixel Grid from the Preferences and turning off all Snaps to enable the ability to aling to sub-pixel positions are testing their theory on a single point of a path! Clearly, no-one tried to actually move an entire path (or even two or more points) using either the Direct Selection tool or the Path Selection tool, which is how you get this buggy behavior in Photoshop to manifest - the inability to not snap to the pixel grid. All you can do with it is to select the path you want to move. ![]() The only way to not have it snap to pixel grid when multiple points or an entire shape is selected is to nudge! The Path Selection tool is completely useless for this functionality. I was going bonkers trying to move an entire vector shape without having it snap, even with "Snap to pixel grid" turned off in the Preferences and all Snaps turned off from the menu. Thank you, thank you, thank you for figuring this out!!!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |